Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Siobhan McHugh's avatar

Wow indeed! That's an impeccable reason for being low on scene tape/actuality 😮 And underlines the gravitas of what this podcast does. 👏 👏 Interestingly, like you, I had had questions and quibbles about S1. Some parts were heartstopping and the investigative stakes were enormous - but my private (judging awards) review notes "no sense of narration as steering/coherent presence. 'Host' seems more like he's been interviewed and his responses cut together". Check! I also noted some wobbly production aspects. Your piece explains all this. Look fwd to checking out Ian Urbina's new business model - curious to see how he can sustain such dedicated (not to mention dangerous) longform work. Off now to binge Season 2 for what sounds like remarkable humanitarian journalism.

No posts

Ready for more?